Pale Fire is the name of 1962 novel by Vladimir Nabokov. A curio, a novel in the form of a long narrative poem with copious eccentric notes that themselves forms a narrative. Perhaps any attempt at verse since the middle of the twentieth century can be viewed as an attempt to establish or prove the relevancy of verse in modern times. Viewed this way most poems fail. For how many of our modern poems attain to any kind of modern currency and can be said to circulate, even among a literati, if such a thing exists, much else a tv drenched generality, as mere mention or quotation? Mention and quotation are the acts that tell us just how deeply poetry, or a particular verse, affects society. There is mention, PBS' newhour, its semi-regular poetry segments, but this is mainly laudable civic duty, the continuing quixotic journals and reviews, but not a piece of work that rises on its own power to prominence and affect in the greater population. What are our great poems, the memorable lines, or whole poems even that compel memorization? Reflection in a Convex Mirror? To me Skunk Hour rises to this height, but admittedly it's not said or quoted much... The Idea of Order in Key West is likewise of a higher order, but not much known among the general population, and I suppose this shows a long time failure to get traction. Both Stevens and Lowell can be difficult, yet they still seem to achieve something affective and memorable. ... The loosening of both form and semantics in modern poetry has not achieved, moved, much or many, in the general population, perhaps not even among devoted readers. Perhaps it is that the modern poem aims at more modest effects, and doesn't mind that much being read and forgotten. Pale Fire pushes, romantically, against these trends, by embracing poetic convention, i.e. metric form, and, perhaps more important, an antic poetic function: narration, storytelling. And on a large scale. |